discussions are vital for fostering collaborative problem-solving and enhancing collective understanding. however, they can be hindered by ambiguity and vagueness, emotional connotations, and differences in jargon and cultural background.

in a short investigation, i wanted to explore how agents could mediate a consensus through a structured communication environment.

the agent functions as a mediator that translates argumentative language without interfering with the arguments.

the agent features:

• adaptive learning about the individual's language and perception of arguments
• makes aware of implicit assumptions and ambigious language.
• measures consensus by stable and majority-based agreement.

if agreement is not achieved, the process proceeds through thesis and antithesis to progressively work towards synthesis.

the agents facilitate the delphi method as a framework for structured discussion. the framework offers several advantages such as anonymity, bias reduction, and iterative feedback to increase understanding among group members.